Blog Post

Alternatives Make up Majority of Family Office Portfolios

Don McDonald • March 21, 2019

Chief Investment Officer January 31, 2019

Alternatives Make Up Majority of Family Office Portfolio

Survey finds alternatives generated 10.2% average return in 2018.

Alternative investments made up the biggest part and were the best-performing asset class for a typical family office portfolio in 2018, according to a new survey from research firm Peltz International.

The survey of 21 family offices found that alternative investments made up more than 52% of family office portfolios, compared to 22% for equities and 15% for fixed income. This is up from the firm’s last survey in 2016, which found that alternatives made up 41.3% of family office portfolios at the time.

The asset class also returned 10.2% during 2018, while the overall family portfolio generated a 7.9% average return. After alternatives, fixed income-developing countries provided the second-highest average return at 8.5%, while equities-developing countries was the only category with a negative return in 2018, losing 6%.

Within alternatives, private equity-direct generated the highest average return in 2018 at 21.4%, followed by private debt at 10.5%; private equity funds at 10.1%; and hedge funds at 3%. Real estate investment trusts was the only category with a negative average return, losing 2.0% for the year.

“In comparing the 2018 survey with our 2016 survey, the average family office surveyed has fewer employees–13 in 2018 compared with 17 in 2016,” said Lois Peltz, author of the report. “There has been an increase in staff in the philanthropy function while there has been a decrease in staff involved with investment activities. However, investment staff remains the largest category.”

The survey also found that more than half of the family offices plan to increase allocations to alternatives in 2019, while one-third said they will increase their allocation to cash, with another one-third planning to boost exposure to equities-developing country.

Among those planning to increase their exposure to alternatives, 29% say they will increase their allocation to real estate direct investments, while the same percentage said they plan to boost allocations to private equity funds. Hedge funds currently account for the largest percentage of alternatives for family portfolios at 28%, followed by real estate direct investments at 26%, and private equity funds at 20% of alternatives. Cryptocurrencies represented only 0.5% of the portfolios, while cannabis investments weren’t cited by any of the surveyed families.

Other highlights of the survey include:

  • Performance and strategy were each rated “the most important” criteria in selecting funds and managers, cited by 18% of family offices.
  • More than 60% of the families targeted US/Canada for geographic opportunities, followed by Asia/Japan, Europe, and Latin/South America.
  • Lackluster investment performance and family dynamics were tied for the largest challenge facing family offices.

Tags: alternatives , Family Office , Peltz International , private equity

By Don McDonald July 30, 2024
We are very proud of our team, who have catipaulted Waverley to the top EMD in Canada based on number of transactions, and number 2 based on fees generated.
May 8, 2024
The recent period, where we have experienced rapid increases in interest rates, has caused many investors to pause when considering real estate as an investment asset class. Central banks try to manage rate changes carefully, as rate changes can have a direct negative impact on capital markets, affecting borrowing costs, which then reduces investments in equipment, labour etc. Ironically an increase in rates can even increase inflation by increasing the costs to purchase necessary items. Gross mismanagement of the Covid crisis, by governments all over the world, has left us with a situation where central banks have made extraordinary increases in rates, causing too many problems to mention, including volatility in the real estate market. Should investors wait on the sidelines to see where markets settle, or until we see more predictable trend lines? While it’s tempting, we are bullish on real estate and here’s why. Real estate has historically delivered high risk-adjusted returns, low volatility, security, and cash flow. This asset class typically makes up around 25% of the portfolios for major pension funds, and for ultra-high net worth (the smart money) investors. We are convinced that real estate should always be considered a long-term investment, and the current market environment should present entry-point opportunities. Real estate is a very broad term. Valuation metrics can vary by type of asset: single-family residential, multi-family residential, commercial, office, and industrial. These of course vary, by region and physical location, where local supply and demand factors have a significant effect. Currently, we favour multi-family residential assets in the right jurisdictions. Some of the primary growth locations have delivered, and are delivering, very strong growth which ensures strong demand and predictable revenues from rents and outright sales. Langford, BC, for instance, grew by 50% over a decade. Multi-family rentals have historically been very stable, and provide good security with strong cash flow. The biggest factor behind our multi-family bullishness is that we have more people than places for them to live. The following chart by National Bank Financial makes this shockingly clear:
By Don McDonald October 12, 2023
https://mailchi.mp/dealpoint.ca/calgary-fintech-awards?e=4ef9dbab10
By Don McDonald October 5, 2023
https://globalnews.ca/news/10005941/kelowna-project-youth-home-ownership-groundbreaking/
By Don McDonald October 1, 2023
https://tiger21.com/news/private-equity-is-now-king-cnbc-com-article-with-tiger-21-founder/
By Don McDonald August 6, 2023
By Don McDonald August 6, 2023
By Don McDonald August 6, 2023
By Don McDonald December 8, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEAHAqmS0NY
By Don McDonald September 24, 2022
In 1929, the Standard & Poors Index (SPX) lost 77% to inflation. It took 24 years  to recover. In 1987, the SPX lost 64% to inflation. It took 21 years  to recover. In 2009, the SPX lost 64% to inflation. It took 12 years  to recover. Bear markets generally last for five years. Can any of us really afford the risk of public market investing????
More Posts
Share by: